Photographs from leyland....

[url=]Gail's leyland photo[/url]

[url=]Laura's leyland photo[/url]

Having done my research and with the help of a computer buff freind of mine liz, i do belive these are over exposure due to the lighting conditions when the photos were taken, now the fact they are one offs and different cameras is interesting. These photos occur more in film based cameras than in digital, but using the wrong setting and having a slower shutter speed could cause this. Now i have sent these off to people to double check my research, as its always good to know.
Simons picture from stockwell spiritalist church will be included on paranormal magazines website with details of our team, and inviting suggestions, good publisity for the team.


Some website which may be of interest:

See the Fake or Explainable "Ghost Photos" section
Fake or Explainable "Ghost Photos"

How to easily fake a ghost picture
Faking pictures

How to do ghost photography
DIY ghost photography

Great Post Laura...

It is sometimes so hard to distinguish images... I think we have all learnt by the last few 'interesting' photo's. The stockwell case and the Leyland investigation have both provided us with food for thought.

We should all get some good photography books or do some courses lol... Note to all us: Practice using the different settings and shutter speeds in various light conditions. It may help us out next time...

yes sure thing i agree barri . i took it upon myself to send picture to image forensic expert and he reckoned top one i took was double exposure.

Thing is the light level, tis still interesting!!

Picapica =

i come in peace to earth from my space ship, its lights can be seen in the photo, bongo you got me!!

Eeerm.....daft as a brush spring to my mind